Gloria FP177 - Francis Poulenc
Requiem Op.9 - Maurice Durufle
This week for the feast of All
Saint’s the choir of St. David’s will present the Gloria by Francis Poulenc (1899-1963) and the Requiem by Maurice Durufle (1902-1986) both with organ accompaniment. These monumental pieces of 20th century French
choral literature showcase the beauty of Gregorian chant and lush jazz
influenced harmonies.
The Gloria of Francis Poulenc was commissioned by the Koussevitsky Foundation
in honor of Sergei and Natalia Koussevitsky. It was premiered on January 21,
1961 by by the Boston Symphony Orchestra and the
Chorus Pro Musica under conductor Charles Münch with Adele Addison as
soloist. The piece was written with Leontyne Price in mind but when she was
unavailable Addison was contracted for the performance.
The piece in six movements is a
setting of the Gloria from the Latin mass. The music is heavily influenced by
the extended harmonies of jazz that are prevalent in all of Poulenc’s
compositions. The piece opens with fanfare but a fanfare that already shows us
the rather “crunchy” harmonies in store. Laudamus
Te, the second movement has criticized for its totally irreverent word
stress. It is a joyous romp that gives way to a plaintive alto solo before
return to the jovial material of the opening.
The soprano soloist enters for the
first time in movement three, Domine
Deus, Rex coelestis in b minor. The choir serves primarily as background
here occasionally doubling with the soloist or adding colorful countermelodies.
The joy of the opening returns in Domini
Fili in a bright G major despite the chorus’s minor entrance and a very
catchy recurring theme.
Movement five resembles movement
three in that both feature the soprano soloist in a minor key on the text “Domine
Deus” (this time followed by “Agnus Dei”). The winding chromatic line is
reminiscent of a sweeping film score rather than a setting of a religious text.
This piece winds its way around until finally settling on an eerie final chord.
The last movement begins with an a cappella fanfare like section that is
punctuated by dissonant chords. This movement perfectly combines the spritely characteristics
of the fast movements with the lush string sounds of movements 3 and 5 in the B
section. The fanfare returns just before the meditative final chord is held
under the pianissimo soprano solo.
Durufle’s Op. 9 Requiem was
commissioned in 1947 by the French publisher Durand. It is sited as being in
memory of the composer’s father but is just as much inspired by the very music
that it is based on. When Durufle received the commission he had already begun
work on a suite for organ based on the Gregorian chants for the Mass for the Dead
but had decided that these pieces are too wedded to the texts that they set to
be separated. He then used them as the basis for his Requiem.
Three versions of the work were
written and published. The first is the version for full orchestra written in
1947. The second (which will be the one that we present) is for organ only. A
third version was written which preserves much of the organ part from the
version for solo organ and adds a small orchestra (trumpets, timpani, harp and
strings) for color.
The piece is based primarily on
traditional Gregorian chants. Like Faure’s Requiem
(which it is often [mistakenly] compared to) this piece does not set the Dies Irae but does include a portion of
it in the Libera Me. The use of chant
in this work is very interesting. It is usually sung at least once in each
movement but Durufle is inconsistent about his treatment of it. In some
movements like Lux Aeterna it seems
clear that the meter is completely defined by the word stress of the chant
while in other movements like the Sanctus
and portions of Libera Me the word
stress is completely disregarded.
The sectional nature of some of
the movements shows the way that Durufle dealt with the different aspects of
diverse texts. The most disparate movements, Domine Jesu Christe and Libera
Me both employ a baritone soloist to deliver a portion of the text as well
as a change of character. In some movements such as the Kyrie Durufle adhered to the traditional form (a fugue) but
disregarded the tripartite iteration of each plea. It seems that while much of
the work is inspired and informed by the traditions of these texts that they
only serve as a guideline for the composer’s writing.
No comments:
Post a Comment