(Adagio, Cantabile, and Finale)
Hymns:#424 East Acklam, #209 St. Botolph, #525 Aurelia
The prelude, postlude and
communion music this week are taken from Charles-Marie Widor’s Sixth Symphonie
Op. 42 No. 2 in g minor. Charles-Marie Widor was born in Lyons to a family of
organ builders. He began his career as an organist at age 11 and soon sparked
the interest of Cavaillé-Coll, the famous organ builder. Cavaillé-Coll made
arrangements for Widor to study at the Brussels Conservatory with the renowned
organist Nicolas-Jacques Lemmens. Upon completion of his studies he moved to Paris where he was
appointed organist of the five manual, 100 stop organ at St. Sulpice in 1870
where he remained for 64 years. Influenced by the organs of Cavaillé-Coll,
Widor created a new medium that he called the “organ symphony,” a
multi-movement work for organ that borrows its forms from the traditional
orchestral symphony which allowed Widor to explore the orchestral capabilities
of the Caviellé-Coll organs. Symphonie VI in g minor was composed in 1878 for
the inauguration of the organ at the Trocadéro and was premiered there on
August 24 by the composer. The overall structure of the symphony alternates
slow and fast movements as well as alternating tonal centers. The first and
third movements are in g minor while the fifth is in G major.
In 1876 Widor attended the Bayreuth premiere of
Wagner’s Der Ring des Nibelungen. The
influence that this experience had on Widor is evident in the chromaticism in
the Adagio.
The composer’s registrations are meant to imitate the full string section of
the orchestra. This is followed by a more turbulent section played on the
strings, flutes and principals of the organ creating a thicker sound that gives
way to soft strings and a solo flute reprising the opening theme.
The Cantabile is the most
melodically driven of the five movements. It has been suggested that this
movement is a “tip of the hat” to Franck whose Trois Pièces were premiered at the same concert series. This
movement varies the melody and accompaniment in such a way that what starts as
an accompaniment becomes more of a countermelody than an accompanimental
figure. This piece is more evocative of orchestral writing than organ writing
lending credibility to Widor’s idea of the “organ symphony.”
The Finale is reminiscent of
the first movement opening with large chords on full organ, but contrary to the
first movement the Finale is in a
major key and has a more active rhythmic drive. This movement moves between
staccato accented sections and more flowing melodic sections building to a
series of trills over a pedal solo and the close of the symphonie.
No comments:
Post a Comment